In re the Arbitration between Hanover Insurance & Piscitello
This text of 200 A.D.2d 366 (In re the Arbitration between Hanover Insurance & Piscitello) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton Williams, J.), entered on or about April 8, 1993, which denied petitioner’s application to stay arbitration of respondents’ uninsured motorist claim, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
[367]*367All of the documentary evidence indicates that the policy covering the offending vehicle had been cancelled effective August 10, 1991 for nonpayment of premiums. No evidence having been offered by petitioner to rebut this showing, its application to stay the arbitration was properly denied. Concur — Carro, J. P., Wallach, Asch and Nardelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
200 A.D.2d 366, 608 N.Y.S.2d 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-hanover-insurance-piscitello-nyappdiv-1994.