In re the Arbitration between Hanover Insurance & Piscitello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Hanover Insurance & Piscitello

200 A.D.2d 366, 608 N.Y.S.2d 65

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 4, 1994·Published

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton Williams, J.), entered on or about April 8, 1993, which denied petitioner’s application to stay arbitration of respondents’ uninsured motorist claim, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

[367]*367All of the documentary evidence indicates that the policy covering the offending vehicle had been cancelled effective August 10, 1991 for nonpayment of premiums. No evidence having been offered by petitioner to rebut this showing, its application to stay the arbitration was properly denied. Concur — Carro, J. P., Wallach, Asch and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton Williams, J.), entered on or about April 8, 1993, which denied petitioner’s application to stay arbitration of respondents’ uninsured motorist claim, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

[367]*367All of the documentary evidence indicates that the policy covering the offending vehicle had been cancelled effective August 10, 1991 for nonpayment of premiums. No evidence having been offered by petitioner to rebut this showing, its application to stay the arbitration was properly denied. Concur — Carro, J. P., Wallach, Asch and Nardelli, JJ.

In re the Arbitration between Hanover Insurance & Piscitello, 200 A.D.2d 366, 608 N.Y.S.2d 65 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

200 A.D.2d 366 (In re the Arbitration between Hanover Insurance & Piscitello) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.