In re the Arbitration between Golenbock & Komoroff

2 A.D.2d 742, 153 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4755
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJuly 3, 1956
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2 A.D.2d 742 (In re the Arbitration between Golenbock & Komoroff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Arbitration between Golenbock & Komoroff, 2 A.D.2d 742, 153 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4755 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Opinions

Memorandum by the Court. It is not clear from the agreement that the parties intended that the named individual and no one else was to arbitrate their differences. Nor, on the other hand, is it clear that arbitration generally, was their object. In the circumstances it would seem advisable to remit the matter to Special Term for the purpose of having testimony taken as to the intention of the parties.

Order appealed from should be modified accordingly. Settle order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oken v. Williams
23 So. 3d 140 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
Zeiler v. Deitsch
500 F.3d 157 (Second Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 A.D.2d 742, 153 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-golenbock-komoroff-nyappdiv-1956.