In re the Arbitration between Golenbock & Komoroff

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Golenbock & Komoroff

2 A.D.2d 742, 153 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4755

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 3, 1956·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Memorandum by the Court. It is not clear from the agreement that the parties intended that the named individual and no one else was to arbitrate their differences. Nor, on the other hand, is it clear that arbitration generally, was their object. In the circumstances it would seem advisable to remit the matter to Special Term for the purpose of having testimony taken as to the intention of the parties.

Order appealed from should be modified accordingly. Settle order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum by the Court. It is not clear from the agreement that the parties intended that the named individual and no one else was to arbitrate their differences. Nor, on the other hand, is it clear that arbitration generally, was their object. In the circumstances it would seem advisable to remit the matter to Special Term for the purpose of having testimony taken as to the intention of the parties.

Order appealed from should be modified accordingly. Settle order.

In re the Arbitration between Golenbock & Komoroff, 2 A.D.2d 742, 153 N.Y.S.2d 309, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4755 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

2 A.D.2d 742 (In re the Arbitration between Golenbock & Komoroff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related