In re the Arbitration Between F.X. Caprara Auto Sales & Wilcox
This text of 288 A.D.2d 955 (In re the Arbitration Between F.X. Caprara Auto Sales & Wilcox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from an order dismissing its petition brought pursuant to CPLR 7511 to vacate an arbitration award. Petitioner failed to submit a complete record of the arbitration proceedings, and thus we are unable to review petitioner’s contentions on appeal concerning the propriety of the award (see generally, Chazy & Westport Tel. Corp. v KFC-Kuntz for Congress, 276 AD2d 872). Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying respondent’s counterclaim for attorney’s fees (see, General Business Law § 198-b [f] [5]). (Appeals from Order of Supreme Court, Jefferson County, Gilbert, J. — Arbitration.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Wisner, Hurlbutt, Kehoe and Lawton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
288 A.D.2d 955, 732 N.Y.S.2d 388, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-fx-caprara-auto-sales-wilcox-nyappdiv-2001.