In Re the Arbitration Between Friedheim

56 N.E.2d 95, 292 N.Y. 664, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 1822
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 18, 1944·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LehmaN, Cb. J., Loughrak, Lewis, CoNWay and Thacher, JJ. Taking no part: Bippey and JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Arbitration Between Friedheim, 56 N.E.2d 95, 292 N.Y. 664, 1944 N.Y. LEXIS 1822 (N.Y. 1944).

56 N.E.2d 95 (In Re the Arbitration Between Friedheim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brinster v. Eckhaus
52 A.D.2d 527 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
In re the Arbitration between Kew Queens Corp. & MacArthur Concrete Pile Corp.
277 A.D.2d 1003 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1950)