In re the Arbitration between Frank Chevrolet Corp. & Meyers

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Frank Chevrolet Corp. & Meyers

16 A.D.2d 794, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9945

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 7, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 16 A.D.2d 794 (In re the Arbitration between Frank Chevrolet Corp. & Meyers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration between Frank Chevrolet Corp. & Meyers, 16 A.D.2d 794, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9945 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to stay arbitration under the terms of a collective labor agreement, petitioner appeals: (1) from an order and “ judgment ” (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 23, 1962, which dismissed the petition, denied petitioner’s application for a stay, and directed the parties to proceed with the arbitration before the named arbitrator; and (2) from an order of said court, dated the same day, granting petitioner’s motion for reargument and on such reargument adhering to the original decision. Order entered on reargument affirmed, with costs. No opinion. The appeal from the original order is dismissed; it was superseded by the order made on reargument. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to stay arbitration under the terms of a collective labor agreement, petitioner appeals: (1) from an order and “ judgment ” (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated January 23, 1962, which dismissed the petition, denied petitioner’s application for a stay, and directed the parties to proceed with the arbitration before the named arbitrator; and (2) from an order of said court, dated the same day, granting petitioner’s motion for reargument and on such reargument adhering to the original decision. Order entered on reargument affirmed, with costs. No opinion. The appeal from the original order is dismissed; it was superseded by the order made on reargument. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 A.D.2d 794, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-frank-chevrolet-corp-meyers-nyappdiv-1962.