In re the Arbitration between Feldman & Brill

521 N.E.2d 437, 70 N.Y.2d 989, 526 N.Y.S.2d 430, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 117
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 9, 1988
StatusPublished

This text of 521 N.E.2d 437 (In re the Arbitration between Feldman & Brill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Arbitration between Feldman & Brill, 521 N.E.2d 437, 70 N.Y.2d 989, 526 N.Y.S.2d 430, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 117 (N.Y. 1988).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal from that portion of the Appellate Division order affirming the orders of Supreme Court denying the motion to amend and denying the motion to intervene dismissed upon the ground that that part of the order does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; motion for leave to appeal otherwise denied.

Judges Kaye and Titone taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
521 N.E.2d 437, 70 N.Y.2d 989, 526 N.Y.S.2d 430, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-feldman-brill-ny-1988.