In re the Arbitration between Fay & Asterloid Mfg. Co.
This text of 281 A.D. 657 (In re the Arbitration between Fay & Asterloid Mfg. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There is no covenant in the agreement between the parties requiring appellant to continue manufacturing. It may not be compelled to arbitrate any claim arising out of its failure to do so. (Matter of Kosoff [“Jones”], 276 App. Div. 621, affd. 303 N. Y. 663.) As there is here a question of fact as to whether appellant has discontinued manufacturing, such issue should first be determined. Order unanimously modified so as to refer to an official referee the question as to whether petitioner has since May, 1952, actually discontinued manufacturing the products in question. Settle order on notice. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Van Voorhis and Breitel, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
281 A.D. 657, 117 N.Y.S.2d 855, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-fay-asterloid-mfg-co-nyappdiv-1952.