Home/New York Court of Appeals/In re the Arbitration between Erlanger & Erlanger

In re the Arbitration between Erlanger & Erlanger

227 N.E.2d 315, 19 N.Y.2d 835, 280 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1580
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 18, 1967
StatusPublished

This text of 227 N.E.2d 315 (In re the Arbitration between Erlanger & Erlanger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Arbitration between Erlanger & Erlanger, 227 N.E.2d 315, 19 N.Y.2d 835, 280 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1580 (N.Y. 1967).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal granted. Upon the argument of this appeal, the Court of Appeals invites the parties to give particular attention to the question of jurisdiction to entertain challenges to the appearance of counsel in a matter on the grounds of alleged professional misconduct, as to which the various departments of the Appellate Division are in conflict. [836]*836(See Marco v. Sachs, 1 AD 2d 851; Matter of Huie [Gottfried], 2 A D 2d 163; Renault, Inc. v. Auto Imports, 19 A D 2d 814; see, also, Erie County Water Auth. v. Western N. T. Water Co., 304 N. Y. 342, cert. den. 344 TI. S. 892; Matter of Weinstock v. Long, 29 Mise 2d 795; Evyan Perfumes v. Hamilton, 22 Mise 2d 616.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Erie County Water Authority v. Western New York Water Co.
107 N.E.2d 479 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)
Marco v. Sachs
1 A.D.2d 851 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
227 N.E.2d 315, 19 N.Y.2d 835, 280 N.Y.S.2d 401, 1967 N.Y. LEXIS 1580, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-erlanger-erlanger-ny-1967.