In re the Arbitration between Empire Mutual Insurance & Samya

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Empire Mutual Insurance & Samya

99 A.D.2d 973, 472 N.Y.S.2d 666, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17383

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 6, 1984

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 99 A.D.2d 973 (In re the Arbitration between Empire Mutual Insurance & Samya) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration between Empire Mutual Insurance & Samya, 99 A.D.2d 973, 472 N.Y.S.2d 666, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17383 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order (one paper) of the Supreme Court, New York County (S. Schwartz, J.), entered July 30, 1983, which granted the petition and permanently stayed arbitration, reversed, on the law, and the petition for a stay denied, with costs. 1Í The respondent-appellant Samya allegedly was hit by an unknown vehicle which left the accident scene at an intersection in Brooklyn. He was hospitalized by ambulance, where he was confined from the date of the accident, July 14, 1982, to July 19. On July 21 he filed a police report. 11 The uninsured motorist indorsement of the insurance policy pursuant to which Samya filed a demand for arbitration and a notice of intention to make a claim, required that the insured or someone on his behalf “have reported the accident within 24 hours or as soon as reasonably possible” to the police. Kin view of the seemingly legitimate hospitalization, the report was made within a reasonable time. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Asch, Fein and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order (one paper) of the Supreme Court, New York County (S. Schwartz, J.), entered July 30, 1983, which granted the petition and permanently stayed arbitration, reversed, on the law, and the petition for a stay denied, with costs. 1Í The respondent-appellant Samya allegedly was hit by an unknown vehicle which left the accident scene at an intersection in Brooklyn. He was hospitalized by ambulance, where he was confined from the date of the accident, July 14, 1982, to July 19. On July 21 he filed a police report. 11 The uninsured motorist indorsement of the insurance policy pursuant to which Samya filed a demand for arbitration and a notice of intention to make a claim, required that the insured or someone on his behalf “have reported the accident within 24 hours or as soon as reasonably possible” to the police. Kin view of the seemingly legitimate hospitalization, the report was made within a reasonable time. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Ross, Asch, Fein and Kassal, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

99 A.D.2d 973, 472 N.Y.S.2d 666, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-empire-mutual-insurance-samya-nyappdiv-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack