In re the Arbitration between Elta Industries, Inc. & Pilot Pen Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Elta Industries, Inc. & Pilot Pen Co.

42 A.D.2d 952, 348 N.Y.S.2d 750, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3341

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 23, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 42 A.D.2d 952 (In re the Arbitration between Elta Industries, Inc. & Pilot Pen Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration between Elta Industries, Inc. & Pilot Pen Co., 42 A.D.2d 952, 348 N.Y.S.2d 750, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3341 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County, entered on December 27, 1972, inter alia, confirming an arbitration award, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of deleting the word “ permanently ” in the third decretal paragraph and granting the injunctive relief only for the duration of the contract [953]*953between the parties. Except as so modified, said order and judgment (one paper) is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. On the record before us, we perceive no unlawful restraint of trade involved in enforcing appellant’s obligations under its exclusive distributorship agreement with respondent. However, the injunctive relief imposed should be limited to the protection required. Concur — iStevens, P. J., Markewieh, Nunez, Kupferman and Murphy, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County, entered on December 27, 1972, inter alia, confirming an arbitration award, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of deleting the word “ permanently ” in the third decretal paragraph and granting the injunctive relief only for the duration of the contract [953]*953between the parties. Except as so modified, said order and judgment (one paper) is affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. On the record before us, we perceive no unlawful restraint of trade involved in enforcing appellant’s obligations under its exclusive distributorship agreement with respondent. However, the injunctive relief imposed should be limited to the protection required. Concur — iStevens, P. J., Markewieh, Nunez, Kupferman and Murphy, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 A.D.2d 952, 348 N.Y.S.2d 750, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3341, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-elta-industries-inc-pilot-pen-co-nyappdiv-1973.