In re the Arbitration between Electronic & Missile Facilities, Inc. & Campbell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Electronic & Missile Facilities, Inc. & Campbell

20 A.D.2d 891, 248 N.Y.S.2d 944, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3907

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 30, 1964·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order, entered on August 13, 1963, granting petitioner-respondent’s motion to compel arbitration and appointing an arbitrator, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs to any party, and the petition dismissed, with leave to petitioner to amend the petition to set forth a proper dispute and demand under the agreement in question. The executed written agreement providing for arbitration of “Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this agreement or the breach thereof” is sufficient to include questions of continued existence of the agreement itself (see 6 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., pars. 7501.23, 7503.02). However, the petition does not state the nature of any arbitrable dispute, as distinguished from asserting merely that there is a dispute. This is insufficient (see Matter of Unipak Aviation Corp. [Mantell], 20 Misc 2d 1078). Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Yalente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered on August 13, 1963, granting petitioner-respondent’s motion to compel arbitration and appointing an arbitrator, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs to any party, and the petition dismissed, with leave to petitioner to amend the petition to set forth a proper dispute and demand under the agreement in question. The executed written agreement providing for arbitration of “Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this agreement or the breach thereof” is sufficient to include questions of continued existence of the agreement itself (see 6 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., pars. 7501.23, 7503.02). However, the petition does not state the nature of any arbitrable dispute, as distinguished from asserting merely that there is a dispute. This is insufficient (see Matter of Unipak Aviation Corp. [Mantell], 20 Misc 2d 1078). Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Yalente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

In re the Arbitration between Electronic & Missile Facilities, Inc. & Campbell, 20 A.D.2d 891, 248 N.Y.S.2d 944, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

20 A.D.2d 891 (In re the Arbitration between Electronic & Missile Facilities, Inc. & Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related