In re the Arbitration between Dunseith & Travia

435 N.E.2d 405, 56 N.Y.2d 582, 450 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3258
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 30, 1982
StatusPublished

This text of 435 N.E.2d 405 (In re the Arbitration between Dunseith & Travia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Arbitration between Dunseith & Travia, 435 N.E.2d 405, 56 N.Y.2d 582, 450 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3258 (N.Y. 1982).

Opinion

[584]*584OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order reversed, with costs, and judgment and order of Special Term (1) granting a request to compel arbitration, and (2) denying a motion to stay arbitration reinstated. Whichever version of the NASD Code of Arbitration Procedure applies to this dispute, under the agreement of the parties, it is for the arbitrators, rather than the courts, to determine whether a particular dispute is arbitrable (see Matter of MPG Capital u Nick, 56 NY2d 515).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MPG Capital Corp. v. Nick
434 N.E.2d 1329 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
435 N.E.2d 405, 56 N.Y.2d 582, 450 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-dunseith-travia-ny-1982.