In re the Arbitration between Dunseith & Travia
This text of 435 N.E.2d 405 (In re the Arbitration between Dunseith & Travia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[584]*584OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [b]), order reversed, with costs, and judgment and order of Special Term (1) granting a request to compel arbitration, and (2) denying a motion to stay arbitration reinstated. Whichever version of the NASD Code of Arbitration Procedure applies to this dispute, under the agreement of the parties, it is for the arbitrators, rather than the courts, to determine whether a particular dispute is arbitrable (see Matter of MPG Capital u Nick, 56 NY2d 515).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
435 N.E.2d 405, 56 N.Y.2d 582, 450 N.Y.S.2d 188, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-dunseith-travia-ny-1982.