In re the Arbitration Between Drug Store Employees Union of Greater New York & Reid & Yeomans, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration Between Drug Store Employees Union of Greater New York & Reid & Yeomans, Inc.

265 A.D. 870, 37 N.Y.S.2d 911, 11 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 660, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6255

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 16, 1942·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Where the question of law involved appears, as here, on the face of the award, the award may be set aside for error of law. (Fudickar v. Guardian Mutual Life Ins. Co., 62 N. Y. 392.) The contract was essentially one between the employer and the union. To the extent that it may under all circumstances be deemed a contract between employer and employee, it is at will and the employees are not entitled to wages from the time of the fire. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Where the question of law involved appears, as here, on the face of the award, the award may be set aside for error of law. (Fudickar v. Guardian Mutual Life Ins. Co., 62 N. Y. 392.) The contract was essentially one between the employer and the union. To the extent that it may under all circumstances be deemed a contract between employer and employee, it is at will and the employees are not entitled to wages from the time of the fire. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

In re the Arbitration Between Drug Store Employees Union of Greater New York & Reid & Yeomans, Inc., 265 A.D. 870, 37 N.Y.S.2d 911, 11 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 660, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6255 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

265 A.D. 870 (In re the Arbitration Between Drug Store Employees Union of Greater New York & Reid & Yeomans, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related