In re the Arbitration between Dorn & Dorn's Transportation, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Dorn & Dorn's Transportation, Inc.

100 A.D.2d 792, 474 N.Y.S.2d 954, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17893

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 17, 1984

StatusPublished

This text of 100 A.D.2d 792 (In re the Arbitration between Dorn & Dorn's Transportation, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration between Dorn & Dorn's Transportation, Inc., 100 A.D.2d 792, 474 N.Y.S.2d 954, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

Order and judgment (one paper) Supreme Court, New York County (Myers, J.), entered August 19,1983, modified, on the law, by remanding for a hearing with respect to the reasonable counsel fees to be awarded to petitioner, and as modified, affirmed, without costs. H The arbitration award was correctly confirmed for the reasons stated at Special Term. However, Special Term erroneously denied petitioner’s request for reasonable counsel fees. Under paragraph 29 of the agreement, petitioner was entitled to the reasonable counsel fees incurred in enforcing the arbitration award. We now remand for an assessment of those damages. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Carro, Silverman, Lynch and Alexander, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order and judgment (one paper) Supreme Court, New York County (Myers, J.), entered August 19,1983, modified, on the law, by remanding for a hearing with respect to the reasonable counsel fees to be awarded to petitioner, and as modified, affirmed, without costs. H The arbitration award was correctly confirmed for the reasons stated at Special Term. However, Special Term erroneously denied petitioner’s request for reasonable counsel fees. Under paragraph 29 of the agreement, petitioner was entitled to the reasonable counsel fees incurred in enforcing the arbitration award. We now remand for an assessment of those damages. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Carro, Silverman, Lynch and Alexander, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 A.D.2d 792, 474 N.Y.S.2d 954, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-dorn-dorns-transportation-inc-nyappdiv-1984.