In re the Arbitration between Dietz & Slatex, Inc.
This text of 9 A.D.2d 758 (In re the Arbitration between Dietz & Slatex, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously reversed, without costs, on the law and on the facts, and in the exercise of discretion remanded to Special Term for appointment of a third arbitrator without prejudice to the rights of the parties to select a third arbitrator by agreement pending or prior to appointment of such arbitrator by the court. There is no warrant in the law to terminate an arbitration proceeding by reason of delay. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, M. M. Prank, Valente and Stevens, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 A.D.2d 758, 193 N.Y.S.2d 997, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5872, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-dietz-slatex-inc-nyappdiv-1959.