Home/New York Court of Appeals/In Re the Arbitration Between Denihan & Denihan

In Re the Arbitration Between Denihan & Denihan

504 N.E.2d 694, 69 N.Y.2d 725, 512 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 15031
New York Court of Appeals·Decided January 15, 1987·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs. Insofar as the Appellate Division dismissed petitioner’s application to stay arbitration, we affirm for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Leonard H. Sandler (119 AD2d 144). To the extent that the Appellate Division granted an injunction pending determination of the issues raised in the arbitration, we conclude that the Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Arbitration Between Denihan & Denihan, 504 N.E.2d 694, 69 N.Y.2d 725, 512 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 15031 (N.Y. 1987).

504 N.E.2d 694 (In Re the Arbitration Between Denihan & Denihan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re the Arbitration between Guarini & Severini
233 A.D.2d 196 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Olympia & York OLP Co. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
214 A.D.2d 509 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Longabardi v. Gherardi
148 A.D.2d 682 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Cove v. Rosenblatt
148 A.D.2d 411 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
In re Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance
133 A.D.2d 87 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)