In Re the Arbitration Between Denihan & Denihan
This text of 504 N.E.2d 694 (In Re the Arbitration Between Denihan & Denihan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, with costs. Insofar as the Appellate Division dismissed petitioner’s application to stay arbitration, we affirm for the reasons stated in the opinion by Justice Leonard H. Sandler (119 AD2d 144). To the extent that the Appellate Division granted an injunction pending determination of the issues raised in the arbitration, we conclude that the Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
504 N.E.2d 694, 69 N.Y.2d 725, 512 N.Y.S.2d 367, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 15031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-denihan-denihan-ny-1987.