In re the Arbitration between Delaware Valley Central School District & Delaware Valley Faculty Ass'n

425 N.E.2d 889, 54 N.Y.2d 613, 442 N.Y.S.2d 501, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2584
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 16, 1981·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On summary consideration, order reversed, with costs, and the applications to stay arbitration denied. It does not alter the classification of articles XXV(F), XXV(E) and III (A) as “substantive” provisions of the contract that their interpretation will determine the duration of the agreement to arbitrate. They are nonetheless “provisions of the agreement” other than the arbitration clause itself and as such are the proper subject of a grievance, and thus of arbitration within the explicit agreement of the parties. (Matter of Windsor Cent. School Dist. v Windsor Teachers Assn., 52 NY2d 734.)

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Arbitration between Delaware Valley Central School District & Delaware Valley Faculty Ass'n, 425 N.E.2d 889, 54 N.Y.2d 613, 442 N.Y.S.2d 501, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2584 (N.Y. 1981).

425 N.E.2d 889 (In re the Arbitration between Delaware Valley Central School District & Delaware Valley Faculty Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newmark & Co. Real Estate Inc. v. 2615 East 17 Street Realty LLC
80 A.D.3d 476 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Buffalo Police Benevolent Ass'n v. City of Buffalo
114 Misc. 2d 1091 (New York Supreme Court, 1982)