In re the Arbitration between De Benedetto & Government Employees Insurance

75 A.D.2d 642, 427 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11106
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 28, 1980
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 75 A.D.2d 642 (In re the Arbitration between De Benedetto & Government Employees Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Arbitration between De Benedetto & Government Employees Insurance, 75 A.D.2d 642, 427 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11106 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

In a proceeding to vacate an arbitration award, the Government Employees Insurance Company appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated October 19, 1978, which, inter alia, vacated the award. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and application denied. The arbitrator’s reliance on evidence of appellant’s office practice and mailing procedure in his determination of the issue of mailing under section 313 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law was not wholly irrational and was therefore not a ground for vacatur of the award under the prevailing standard of review for compulsory arbitration (see Matter of Garcia v Federal Ins. Co., 46 NY2d 1040; cf. Mount St. Mary’s Hosp. of Niagara Falls v Catherwood, 26 NY2d 493; Caso v Coffey, 41 NY2d 153). Furthermore, the arbitrator did not exceed his power by finding that coverage was terminated on July 3, 1977, rather than on April 3, 1977, the termination date orginally asserted by appellant. The scope of the controversy submitted to arbitration is governed by the demand for arbitration, which, in this case, indicates that the issue to be resolved was the general question of the insured’s coverage as of the date of the accident, September 11,1977. Damiani, J. P., Gulotta, Margett and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lane v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
194 A.D.2d 676 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
In re the Arbitration between Civil Service Employees Ass'n, Local 842 & City of Troy
117 A.D.2d 944 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
In re the Arbitration between Shand & Aetna Insurance
74 A.D.2d 442 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 A.D.2d 642, 427 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-de-benedetto-government-employees-insurance-nyappdiv-1980.