In re the Arbitration between Country-Wide Insurance & Zampino
This text of 97 A.D.2d 728 (In re the Arbitration between Country-Wide Insurance & Zampino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment of December 20,1982, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard Nadel, J.), which gave summary judgment to Country-Wide by declaring the driver’s vehicle was insured by Prudential, unanimously reversed, on the law, with costs, and the matter is remanded for a de novo hearing. Respondent Zampino was a passenger in a 1969 Chevrolet driven by William Carmody when a collision occurred. Zampino made a claim under his own policy with Country-Wide on the grounds that the automobile was not insured. When Country-Wide rejected the claim, Zampino demanded arbitration. Country-Wide, in turn, petitioned to permanently stay arbitration, alleging that the vehicle was in fact insured by Prudential, and that Prudential’s notice of cancellation (for nonpayment of premium) was ineffective. We find a number of issues which preclude summary judgment and require a fuller hearing. Among these questions must be whether Prudential issued Carmody a policy for this vehicle, or instead, for a 1968 Chevrolet, and if the latter, whether the contractual provision for coverage of subsequently acquired automobiles requires notice from the insured to the insurer. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Kupferman, Carro, Silverman and Kassal, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 A.D.2d 728, 468 N.Y.S.2d 635, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 20449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-country-wide-insurance-zampino-nyappdiv-1983.