In re the Arbitration between Country-Wide Insurance & Spero

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Country-Wide Insurance & Spero

61 A.D.2d 755, 402 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10144

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 14, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 61 A.D.2d 755 (In re the Arbitration between Country-Wide Insurance & Spero) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration between Country-Wide Insurance & Spero, 61 A.D.2d 755, 402 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10144 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered September 27, 1977, denying petitioner-appellant’s motion to stay arbitration, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and the motion granted to the extent of remanding for a hearing on whether a report of the underlying alleged accident was made to police and when, and whether respondent-respondent made all reasonable efforts to ascertain the identity of the offending vehicle. The papers in opposition to the application state no more than the hearsay allegation that some unknown person had called police. (See Insurance Law, § 608, subd [b]; Matter of O’Rouke v Motor Vehicle Acc. Ind. Corp., 29 AD2d 938.) Concur—Lupiano, J. P., Birns, Silverman, Fein and Markewich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered September 27, 1977, denying petitioner-appellant’s motion to stay arbitration, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs and without disbursements, and the motion granted to the extent of remanding for a hearing on whether a report of the underlying alleged accident was made to police and when, and whether respondent-respondent made all reasonable efforts to ascertain the identity of the offending vehicle. The papers in opposition to the application state no more than the hearsay allegation that some unknown person had called police. (See Insurance Law, § 608, subd [b]; Matter of O’Rouke v Motor Vehicle Acc. Ind. Corp., 29 AD2d 938.) Concur—Lupiano, J. P., Birns, Silverman, Fein and Markewich, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 A.D.2d 755, 402 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-country-wide-insurance-spero-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack