In re the Arbitration between Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance & Hughes

63 A.D.2d 874, 405 N.Y.S.2d 469, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11866
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 1, 1978
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 63 A.D.2d 874 (In re the Arbitration between Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance & Hughes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Arbitration between Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance & Hughes, 63 A.D.2d 874, 405 N.Y.S.2d 469, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11866 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered December 28, 1977, denying petitioner’s application to stay arbitration pursuant to uninsured motorist clause, is unanimously affirmed, with $40 costs and disbursements [875]*875of this appeal to claimant-respondent by appellant. Claimant-respondent submitted a copy of Form FS-8.7 of the New York State Department of Motor Vehicles in which the department states that the allegedly offending car was not covered by financial security at the date of the accident and that the department has revoked the driver’s license of the operator of the offending vehicle and also the license and registration of the owner. Petitioner Cosmopolitan submitted absolutely nothing to contradict this but merely suggested the possibility of infirmities in the cancellation of the insurance of the offending vehicle, with no evidence to suggest that there are in fact such infirmities. Thus, "The claimants have presented 'some reasonably persuasive evidence of noninsurance’ of the third party vehicle and appellant has not presented evidence that there was insurance, but has only asserted 'possible gaps * * * without any effort to fill those gaps’ (see Aetna Ins. Co. v Logue, 68 Mise 2d 841, 843, 846, 847).” (Matter of Albohn v Allstate Ins. Co., 51 AD2d 797.) (See, also, Matter of Foster [MVAIC], 55 Mise 2d 784, 786-787; Zelanka v MVAIC, 32 AD2d 847.) Concur—Lupiano, J. P., Birns, Silverman, Evans and Sandler, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Youngblood
270 A.D.2d 493 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
In re the Arbitration between Commercial Union Insurance Companies & Pouncy
120 A.D.2d 382 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
In re the Arbitration between Amica Mutual Ins.
70 A.D.2d 811 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 A.D.2d 874, 405 N.Y.S.2d 469, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-cosmopolitan-mutual-insurance-hughes-nyappdiv-1978.