In re the Arbitration between Colestock & Utica Mutual Insurance
This text of 28 A.D.2d 1205 (In re the Arbitration between Colestock & Utica Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Memorandum: Special Term erred in vacating appellant’s demand for arbitration and staying further proceedings. Its reliance on MVAIC v. Eisenberg (18 N Y 2d 1) was misplaced. The uncontroverted proof establishes that claimant’s vehicle was struck by a “hit-and-run automobile” within the meaning of the policy provision. (Appeal from order of Chautauqua Special Term, staying arbitration and vacating demand for arbitration.) Present — Bastow, J. P., Goldman, Henry, Del Veechio and Marsh, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 A.D.2d 1205, 285 N.Y.S.2d 356, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-colestock-utica-mutual-insurance-nyappdiv-1967.