In re the Arbitration between Cohen & Cohen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Cohen & Cohen

8 A.D.2d 798, 190 N.Y.S.2d 324, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7874

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 22, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 8 A.D.2d 798 (In re the Arbitration between Cohen & Cohen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration between Cohen & Cohen, 8 A.D.2d 798, 190 N.Y.S.2d 324, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7874 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion denied upon condition that the petitioners-respondents consent to the restoration of the title in the proceeding to the form it was prior to the resettled order and on the further condition that the petitioners-respondents consent to the right of Murray Hill Academy of Theatre & Arts, Inc., to assert any and all counterclaims in the arbitration proceeding; in the event the petitioners-respondents fail to so stipulate by 6:00 p.m. on Monday, June 22, 1959, then the motion is granted on condition that the appellants procure the record on appeal and appellants’ points to be served and filed on or before August 27, 1959, with notice of argument for September 8, 1959, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Tálente and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion denied upon condition that the petitioners-respondents consent to the restoration of the title in the proceeding to the form it was prior to the resettled order and on the further condition that the petitioners-respondents consent to the right of Murray Hill Academy of Theatre & Arts, Inc., to assert any and all counterclaims in the arbitration proceeding; in the event the petitioners-respondents fail to so stipulate by 6:00 p.m. on Monday, June 22, 1959, then the motion is granted on condition that the appellants procure the record on appeal and appellants’ points to be served and filed on or before August 27, 1959, with notice of argument for September 8, 1959, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, Tálente and McNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 A.D.2d 798, 190 N.Y.S.2d 324, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-cohen-cohen-nyappdiv-1959.