In re the Arbitration between Co-Op City PBA & Riverbay Corp.
501 N.E.2d 32, 68 N.Y.2d 846, 508 N.Y.S.2d 424, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20535
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (114 AD2d 768; see also, De Paulo v City of Albany, 49 NY2d 994; Matter of Sprinzen [Nomberg], 46 NY2d 623; Binghamton Civ. Serv. Forum v City of Binghamton, 44 NY2d 23).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Meyer, Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone and Hancock, Jr.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Arbitration between Co-Op City PBA & Riverbay Corp., 501 N.E.2d 32, 68 N.Y.2d 846, 508 N.Y.S.2d 424, 1986 N.Y. LEXIS 20535 (N.Y. 1986).
501 N.E.2d 32 (In re the Arbitration between Co-Op City PBA & Riverbay Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Arbitration between Sprinzen & Nomberg
389 N.E.2d 456 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
De Paulo v. City of Albany
406 N.E.2d 1064 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
In re the Arbitration between Co-Op City PBA
114 A.D.2d 768 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)