In re the Arbitration between Cinebox General Advertising, Inc. & Societa Internationale Fonovisione

29 A.D.2d 534, 285 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2674
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 21, 1967
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 29 A.D.2d 534 (In re the Arbitration between Cinebox General Advertising, Inc. & Societa Internationale Fonovisione) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Arbitration between Cinebox General Advertising, Inc. & Societa Internationale Fonovisione, 29 A.D.2d 534, 285 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2674 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

Order, entered September 14, 1967, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements to petitioner-appellant, motion of petitioner for confirmation of award and entry of judgment thereon granted, and cross motion of respondent to remand matter to arbitrators denied. The award of the arbitrators, which awards a fixed sum as damages to the petitioner for .breach of contract and denies in their entirety all claims of the respondent against petitioner,, expressly states that it is in final determination and full settlement of all claims of the respective parties under said contract submitted to arbitration hereunder.” The award, on its face, purports to be a final and definite determination of the subject matter submitted, and its validity is unaffected by the failure to- show the basis for the award. Absent a showing of misconduct on the part of the arbitrators, the court is not entitled to inquire as to the reasoning or processes by which the arbitrators arrived at the award. (See Matter of Weiner Co. [Freund Co.], 2 A D 2d 341, affd. 3 N Y 2d 806; Matter of Willow Fabrics [Carolina Frgt. Carriers Corp.], 20 A D 2d 864, affd. 16 N Y 2d 929; Matter of Bay Ridge Med. Group v. Health Ins. Plan, 22 A D 2d 807; Matter of Colletti [Mesh], 23 A D 2d 245, affd. 17 N Y 2d 460.) Concur — Eager, J. P., Steuer, Copozzoli, Tilzer and McGivern, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Arbitration between Israel Aircraft Industries Ltd. & DDY-Wing Aviation Ltd.
284 A.D.2d 281 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
In re the Arbitration between Guetta & Raxon Fabrics Corp.
123 A.D.2d 40 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 A.D.2d 534, 285 N.Y.S.2d 873, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-cinebox-general-advertising-inc-societa-nyappdiv-1967.