In re the Arbitration between Chemspun Yarns, Ltd. & Pacific Mills

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Chemspun Yarns, Ltd. & Pacific Mills

285 A.D. 1185, 141 N.Y.S.2d 159, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7100

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 31, 1955·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order denying appellant’s application to stay an arbitration or, in the alternative, for a jury trial of certain specified issues, [1186] affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The language of the arbitration provision of the contract is sufficiently broad to express the intention of the parties to submit a dispute such as the one herein to arbitration. (Matter of TApman [Kaeuser Shellac <7o.], 289 N. Y. 76; Matter of Kahn [National Gity Bank], 284 N. Y. 515; Matter of Raphael [Silberberg], 274 App. Div. 625.) The issues of fact raised by the petition are matters for determination by the arbitrators. Appellant was in no way prejudiced by the fact that the demand for arbitration, which was full and complete, was executed by the duly authorized attorney, instead of a duly authorized officer, of respondent. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Mac Crate, Schmidt, Beldock and Murphy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying appellant’s application to stay an arbitration or, in the alternative, for a jury trial of certain specified issues, [1186] affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The language of the arbitration provision of the contract is sufficiently broad to express the intention of the parties to submit a dispute such as the one herein to arbitration. (Matter of TApman [Kaeuser Shellac <7o.], 289 N. Y. 76; Matter of Kahn [National Gity Bank], 284 N. Y. 515; Matter of Raphael [Silberberg], 274 App. Div. 625.) The issues of fact raised by the petition are matters for determination by the arbitrators. Appellant was in no way prejudiced by the fact that the demand for arbitration, which was full and complete, was executed by the duly authorized attorney, instead of a duly authorized officer, of respondent. Wenzel, Acting P. J., Mac Crate, Schmidt, Beldock and Murphy, JJ., concur.

In re the Arbitration between Chemspun Yarns, Ltd. & Pacific Mills, 285 A.D. 1185, 141 N.Y.S.2d 159, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7100 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

285 A.D. 1185 (In re the Arbitration between Chemspun Yarns, Ltd. & Pacific Mills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related