In Re the Arbitration Between Catz American Sales Corp. & Holleb & Co.

80 N.E.2d 656, 298 N.Y. 504, 1948 N.Y. LEXIS 1101
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 4, 1948
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 80 N.E.2d 656 (In Re the Arbitration Between Catz American Sales Corp. & Holleb & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In Re the Arbitration Between Catz American Sales Corp. & Holleb & Co., 80 N.E.2d 656, 298 N.Y. 504, 1948 N.Y. LEXIS 1101 (N.Y. 1948).

Opinion

*506 Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Russell v. Raynes Associates Ltd.
166 A.D.2d 6 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
In re the Arbitration between Itoman (U.S.A.), Inc. & Daewoo Corp.
502 N.E.2d 989 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Just In-Material Designs, Ltd. v. I.T.A.D. Associates, Inc.
94 A.D.2d 103 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)
In re the Arbitration between L. N. Jackson & Co. & Compania Gasoliba Soc. Anon.
282 A.D. 125 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1953)
In re the Arbitration between Arthur Philip Export Corp. & Leathertone, Inc.
275 A.D.2d 102 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 N.E.2d 656, 298 N.Y. 504, 1948 N.Y. LEXIS 1101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-catz-american-sales-corp-holleb-co-ny-1948.