In re the Arbitration between Brill & Muller Bros.
188 N.E.2d 792, 12 N.Y.2d 944, 238 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1963 N.Y. LEXIS 1460
This text of 188 N.E.2d 792 (In re the Arbitration between Brill & Muller Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
In re the Arbitration between Brill & Muller Bros., 188 N.E.2d 792, 12 N.Y.2d 944, 238 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1963 N.Y. LEXIS 1460 (N.Y. 1963).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from is not a final order within the meaning of the Constitution.
Motion for leave to prosecute the appeal, taken as of right from the order of the Appellate Division dated October 23,1962, as a poor person granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
188 N.E.2d 792, 12 N.Y.2d 944, 238 N.Y.S.2d 519, 1963 N.Y. LEXIS 1460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-brill-muller-bros-ny-1963.