In re the Arbitration between Botany Worsted Mills & Friedricks

262 A.D. 1006, 30 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6977

This text of 262 A.D. 1006 (In re the Arbitration between Botany Worsted Mills & Friedricks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Arbitration between Botany Worsted Mills & Friedricks, 262 A.D. 1006, 30 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6977 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Opinion

Order unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Dore and Cohn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 A.D. 1006, 30 N.Y.S.2d 843, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6977, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-botany-worsted-mills-friedricks-nyappdiv-1941.