In re the Arbitration between Board of Education of the Clarkstown Central School District & Nelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Board of Education of the Clarkstown Central School District & Nelson

57 A.D.2d 893, 394 N.Y.S.2d 572, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12128

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 16, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 57 A.D.2d 893 (In re the Arbitration between Board of Education of the Clarkstown Central School District & Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration between Board of Education of the Clarkstown Central School District & Nelson, 57 A.D.2d 893, 394 N.Y.S.2d 572, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12128 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to stay arbitration of a contractual dispute, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered May 27, 1976, which granted petitioner’s application and denied appellant’s cross application to compel arbitration. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. On or about March 10, 1976, appellant served a demand for arbitration based upon the allegation that petitioner’s unilateral promulgation of new procedures for replacing absent teachers with substitute teachers violated "Article VIII para, a.” of a collective bargaining agreement dated July 7, 1974. In a previous arbitration award, dated July 24, 1975, the [894]*894arbitrator decided that the arrangements made by petitioner-respondent for the hiring of substitute teachers were improper, but that the collective bargaining agreement only allowed him, the arbitrator, to render an advisory award in the matter. Under the circumstances it is unnecessary for us to pass upon whether the demand for arbitration was untimely. The only dispute in this case has been resolved by the earlier arbitration award (see Rembrandt Ind. v Hodges Int., 38 NY2d 502). Martuscello, J. P., Latham, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to stay arbitration of a contractual dispute, the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County, entered May 27, 1976, which granted petitioner’s application and denied appellant’s cross application to compel arbitration. Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements. On or about March 10, 1976, appellant served a demand for arbitration based upon the allegation that petitioner’s unilateral promulgation of new procedures for replacing absent teachers with substitute teachers violated "Article VIII para, a.” of a collective bargaining agreement dated July 7, 1974. In a previous arbitration award, dated July 24, 1975, the [894]*894arbitrator decided that the arrangements made by petitioner-respondent for the hiring of substitute teachers were improper, but that the collective bargaining agreement only allowed him, the arbitrator, to render an advisory award in the matter. Under the circumstances it is unnecessary for us to pass upon whether the demand for arbitration was untimely. The only dispute in this case has been resolved by the earlier arbitration award (see Rembrandt Ind. v Hodges Int., 38 NY2d 502). Martuscello, J. P., Latham, Shapiro and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 A.D.2d 893, 394 N.Y.S.2d 572, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-board-of-education-of-the-clarkstown-central-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack