In Re the Arbitration Between Behrens & Feurring

74 N.E.2d 180, 297 N.Y. 472, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 981
New York Court of Appeals·Decided May 22, 1947·Published

Opinion

Motion by appellant for reargument, denied, with $10 costs and necessary printing disbursements. The record herein was silent as to the basis of the arbitrators’ award. This court, by its decision, made no attempt to speculate as to that matter, but held that since the award might have rested on a ground which the arbitrators were competent to consider, other than that of fraud, there was no warrant for an inference of usurpation of power by them or other abuse of their office.” [See 296 N. Y. 172.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Re the Arbitration Between Behrens & Feurring, 74 N.E.2d 180, 297 N.Y. 472, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 981 (N.Y. 1947).

74 N.E.2d 180 (In Re the Arbitration Between Behrens & Feurring) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re the Arbitration Between Behrens & Feuerring
71 N.E.2d 454 (New York Court of Appeals, 1947)