In Re the Arbitration Between Behrens & Feurring

New York Court of Appeals

In Re the Arbitration Between Behrens & Feurring

74 N.E.2d 180, 297 N.Y. 472, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 981

DecidedMay 22, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 74 N.E.2d 180 (In Re the Arbitration Between Behrens & Feurring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re the Arbitration Between Behrens & Feurring, 74 N.E.2d 180, 297 N.Y. 472, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 981 (N.Y. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by appellant for reargument, denied, with $10 costs and necessary printing disbursements. The record herein was silent as to the basis of the arbitrators’ award. This court, by its decision, made no attempt to speculate as to that matter, but held that since the award might have rested on a ground which the arbitrators were competent to consider, other than that of fraud, there was “ no warrant for an inference of usurpation of power by them or other abuse of their office.” [See 296 N. Y. 172.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by appellant for reargument, denied, with $10 costs and necessary printing disbursements. The record herein was silent as to the basis of the arbitrators’ award. This court, by its decision, made no attempt to speculate as to that matter, but held that since the award might have rested on a ground which the arbitrators were competent to consider, other than that of fraud, there was “ no warrant for an inference of usurpation of power by them or other abuse of their office.” [See 296 N. Y. 172.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 N.E.2d 180, 297 N.Y. 472, 1947 N.Y. LEXIS 981, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-behrens-feurring-ny-1947.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack