In re the Arbitration between Bassett & Magner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Bassett & Magner

212 A.D. 879

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1925·Published

Opinion

The record does not disclose facts sufficient either to warrant the court in relieving the defendant of his stipulation, or to justify the setting aside of the award of the [880]*880arbitrators. (Wiberly v. Matthews, 91 N. Y. 648; Civ. Prac. Act, § 1457.) The orders are, therefore, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to confirm the majority award of the arbitrators granted, with ten dollars costs. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Kelby and Young, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The record does not disclose facts sufficient either to warrant the court in relieving the defendant of his stipulation, or to justify the setting aside of the award of the [880]*880arbitrators. (Wiberly v. Matthews, 91 N. Y. 648; Civ. Prac. Act, § 1457.) The orders are, therefore, reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to confirm the majority award of the arbitrators granted, with ten dollars costs. Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Kelby and Young, JJ., concur.

In re the Arbitration between Bassett & Magner, 212 A.D. 879 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

212 A.D. 879 (In re the Arbitration between Bassett & Magner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related