In re the Arbitration between Associated Metals & Minerals Corp. & Kemikalija

11 A.D.2d 988, 205 N.Y.S.2d 176, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7794

Opinion

Order, entered 'February 29, 1960, denying petitioner-appellant’s motion to stay arbitration, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. The refusal of the buyer to make payment for the balance due on goods sold and delivered was a sufficient dispute authorizing arbitration within the provisions of the broad arbitration clause contained in the contract of sale. To the extent that Matter of Webster v. Van Allen (217 App. Div. 219 [4th Dept.]) seems to point to the contrary, the reasoning and conclusion in that case are not found persuasive. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Stevens and Eager, JJ. [23 Misc 2d 98.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Arbitration between Associated Metals & Minerals Corp. & Kemikalija, 11 A.D.2d 988, 205 N.Y.S.2d 176, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7794 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

11 A.D.2d 988 (In re the Arbitration between Associated Metals & Minerals Corp. & Kemikalija) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Webster v. Van Allen
217 A.D. 219 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)