In re the Arbitration between Asoma (Bangkok) Co. & Thai Flourite Processing Co.

460 N.E.2d 1097, 61 N.Y.2d 721, 472 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4021
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJanuary 12, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 460 N.E.2d 1097 (In re the Arbitration between Asoma (Bangkok) Co. & Thai Flourite Processing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Arbitration between Asoma (Bangkok) Co. & Thai Flourite Processing Co., 460 N.E.2d 1097, 61 N.Y.2d 721, 472 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4021 (N.Y. 1984).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order [722]*722affirmed, with costs. Nothing supports the contention of the appellant that in making the award herein the arbitrator exceeded his power (CPLR 7511, subd [b], par 1, cl [iii]).

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Kaye. Taking no part: Judge Simons.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Arbitration between Shefa Brucha Inc. & Topaz Electronics, Inc.
233 A.D.2d 276 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Financial Clearing & Services Corp. v. Theodore
161 A.D.2d 362 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
460 N.E.2d 1097, 61 N.Y.2d 721, 472 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-asoma-bangkok-co-thai-flourite-ny-1984.