In re the Arbitration between Asoma (Bangkok) Co. & Thai Flourite Processing Co.
460 N.E.2d 1097, 61 N.Y.2d 721, 472 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4021
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order [722]*722affirmed, with costs. Nothing supports the contention of the appellant that in making the award herein the arbitrator exceeded his power (CPLR 7511, subd [b], par 1, cl [iii]).
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Kaye. Taking no part: Judge Simons.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Arbitration between Asoma (Bangkok) Co. & Thai Flourite Processing Co., 460 N.E.2d 1097, 61 N.Y.2d 721, 472 N.Y.S.2d 612, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4021 (N.Y. 1984).
460 N.E.2d 1097 (In re the Arbitration between Asoma (Bangkok) Co. & Thai Flourite Processing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re the Arbitration between Shefa Brucha Inc. & Topaz Electronics, Inc.
233 A.D.2d 276 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Financial Clearing & Services Corp. v. Theodore
161 A.D.2d 362 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)