In re the Arbitration between American Transit Insurance & Baez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between American Transit Insurance & Baez

278 A.D.2d 45, 717 N.Y.S.2d 169, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12660

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 7, 2000·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly Cohen, J.), entered September 9, 1999, denying petitioner’s application for a permanent stay of arbitration of respondent Baez’s claim for uninsured motorist benefits, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

At common law, the owner of an automobile who leaves her keys in her car is not liable for the negligence of a thief (see, Phifer v State of New York, 204 AD2d 612; Epstein v Mediterranean Motors, 109 AD2d 340, 343, affd 66 NY2d 1018), and there is no demonstration that respondent owner Pauline Louzar left her vehicle “unattended” within the meaning of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1210 (a) on the occasion of its theft. Rather, she left the vehicle with her husband, who, at the time was seated in the right front passenger seat. Then her husband momentarily stepped away from the vehicle to prepay the pump attendant for refueling, at which time her car was stolen (see, Matter of Hartford Ins. Co. v Aquaviva, 179 AD2d 546; Simon v El Serv. Corp., 85 AD2d 556). Accordingly, the owner’s li[46] ability coverage, issued by respondent Travelers Insurance Company, may not be reached in satisfaction of respondent Baez’s claim stemming from Baez’s collision with the stolen vehicle, and the arbitration of such claim pursuant to the uninsured motorist indorsement of his policy with petitioner insurer was properly permitted to proceed. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Afidrias, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly Cohen, J.), entered September 9, 1999, denying petitioner’s application for a permanent stay of arbitration of respondent Baez’s claim for uninsured motorist benefits, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

At common law, the owner of an automobile who leaves her keys in her car is not liable for the negligence of a thief (see, Phifer v State of New York, 204 AD2d 612; Epstein v Mediterranean Motors, 109 AD2d 340, 343, affd 66 NY2d 1018), and there is no demonstration that respondent owner Pauline Louzar left her vehicle “unattended” within the meaning of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1210 (a) on the occasion of its theft. Rather, she left the vehicle with her husband, who, at the time was seated in the right front passenger seat. Then her husband momentarily stepped away from the vehicle to prepay the pump attendant for refueling, at which time her car was stolen (see, Matter of Hartford Ins. Co. v Aquaviva, 179 AD2d 546; Simon v El Serv. Corp., 85 AD2d 556). Accordingly, the owner’s li[46] ability coverage, issued by respondent Travelers Insurance Company, may not be reached in satisfaction of respondent Baez’s claim stemming from Baez’s collision with the stolen vehicle, and the arbitration of such claim pursuant to the uninsured motorist indorsement of his policy with petitioner insurer was properly permitted to proceed. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Afidrias, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

In re the Arbitration between American Transit Insurance & Baez, 278 A.D.2d 45, 717 N.Y.S.2d 169, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12660 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

278 A.D.2d 45 (In re the Arbitration between American Transit Insurance & Baez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related