In re the Arbitration between American Bosch Arma Corp. & Stewart

New York Court of Appeals

In re the Arbitration between American Bosch Arma Corp. & Stewart

205 N.E.2d 870, 15 N.Y.2d 840, 257 N.Y.S.2d 949, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1601, 58 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2781

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 11, 1965

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 205 N.E.2d 870 (In re the Arbitration between American Bosch Arma Corp. & Stewart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration between American Bosch Arma Corp. & Stewart, 205 N.E.2d 870, 15 N.Y.2d 840, 257 N.Y.S.2d 949, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1601, 58 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2781 (N.Y. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

•Order reversed, with costs in all courts, and matter remitted to Special Term for further proceedings in accordance with a memorandum: The collective bargaining agreement between the employer and the union required the employer to provide [842]*842specified insurance benefits ,to its employees. The dispute which is the basis of the union’s demand for arbitration concerns the extent of coverage of the policies which the employer provided. This dispute literally falls within the arbitration clause which embraces the “ interpretation or the application ” of the agreement.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Bubke and Beegan. Judge Scileppi dissents and votes to affirm in the following memorandum in which Judge Van Vooehis concurs: I dissent and vote to affirm upon the ground that the claims of the employees against the insurance companies under the policies admittedly furnished by the employer do not come within the arbitration clause.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

•Order reversed, with costs in all courts, and matter remitted to Special Term for further proceedings in accordance with a memorandum: The collective bargaining agreement between the employer and the union required the employer to provide [842]*842specified insurance benefits ,to its employees. The dispute which is the basis of the union’s demand for arbitration concerns the extent of coverage of the policies which the employer provided. This dispute literally falls within the arbitration clause which embraces the “ interpretation or the application ” of the agreement.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Bubke and Beegan. Judge Scileppi dissents and votes to affirm in the following memorandum in which Judge Van Vooehis concurs: I dissent and vote to affirm upon the ground that the claims of the employees against the insurance companies under the policies admittedly furnished by the employer do not come within the arbitration clause.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 N.E.2d 870, 15 N.Y.2d 840, 257 N.Y.S.2d 949, 1965 N.Y. LEXIS 1601, 58 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-american-bosch-arma-corp-stewart-ny-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack