In re the Arbitration between Amalgamated Watch, Clock & Time Instrument Workers & Jaeger Watch Co.

270 A.D. 802, 59 N.Y.S.2d 731, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3992
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 8, 1946
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 270 A.D. 802 (In re the Arbitration between Amalgamated Watch, Clock & Time Instrument Workers & Jaeger Watch Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Arbitration between Amalgamated Watch, Clock & Time Instrument Workers & Jaeger Watch Co., 270 A.D. 802, 59 N.Y.S.2d 731, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3992 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, a labor union, appeals from an order denying its motion to confirm an arbitrators’ award. The arbitration was had pursuant to a labor contract between petitioner and respondent. The respondent challenged the award and confirmation was denied upon the ground that the award contained provisions beyond the issue submitted to arbitration under the contract.

We find that paragraphs 3 and 5-b of the award do go beyond the issue submitted under the contract, but that these paragraphs do not affect the merits of the decision upon the matters submitted. Accordingly, the award should be modified by deleting paragraphs 3 and- 5-b and, as so modified, the award should be confirmed (Civ. Prac. Act, § 1462-a; Matter of Marchant and Mead-Morrison Mfg. Co., 226 App. Div. 397, mod. 252 N. Y. 284).

The order appealed from should be reversed, without costs, and the motion granted in conformity with this opinion.

Martin, P. J., Townley, Glenhon, Cohn and Peck, JJ., concur.

Order unanimously reversed; without costs, and the motion granted in conformity with opinion. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rodriguez v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.
81 A.D.2d 811 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
270 A.D. 802, 59 N.Y.S.2d 731, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3992, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-amalgamated-watch-clock-time-instrument-nyappdiv-1946.