In re the Arbitration Between Allstate Insurance & Smith

26 Misc. 2d 859, 207 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2475
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 14, 1960
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 26 Misc. 2d 859 (In re the Arbitration Between Allstate Insurance & Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Arbitration Between Allstate Insurance & Smith, 26 Misc. 2d 859, 207 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2475 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1960).

Opinion

Henry Epstein, J.

This is a motion for an order staying arbitration. The respondent herein was injured as the result of an accident which occurred on or about May 17, 1956. The accident involved two vehicles, one of which was operated by respondent and the other was owned by one David Smith and operated by Eleanor Johnson. At the time of the accident David Smith did not carry liability insurance but the operator did carry liability insurance.

Eleanor Johnson’s carrier disclaimed liability under her policy for failure to comply with the terms of the policy.

Respondent’s policy with Allstate contained a provision whereby the insured (Smith) if injured by an “ uninsured automobile ’ ’ could recover from his carrier all sums which the insured would be legally entitled to recover and if the parties could not agree as to the amount thereof then the amount shall be decided by arbitration.

The policy defines ‘ ‘ Uninsured Automobile ’ ’ as follows: “ an automobile with respect to the ownership, maintenance or use of which there is no bodily injury liability insurance applicable at the time of the accident, or an automobile used without the permission of the owner thereof if there is no bodily injury liability insurance applicable at the time of the accident with respect to the operator thereof ’ ’.

[860]*860Clearly, the purpose of such an indorsement in a policy of insurance is intended to afford the assured an additional protection in the event an accident occurred involving someone without or of doubtful financial responsibility.

The policy of insurance carried by Johnson inured to the benefit of any person injured by Johnson during the period of operation of a motor vehicle and the language of the policy issued to respondent clearly excludes from its coverage injuries sustained with respect to the use of an automobile when there is liability insurance.

The motion is granted and arbitration is stayed. Whether the car in question is an uninsured automobile is not left to arbitration under the policy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Cummings
778 P.2d 370 (Court of Appeals of Kansas, 1989)
General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. Means
362 So. 2d 135 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)
Fielder v. AMICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
378 A.2d 1386 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1977)
Motorists Mutual Ins. Co. v. Tomanski
271 N.E.2d 924 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1971)
In re the Arbitration between Vanguard Insurance & Polchlopek
222 N.E.2d 383 (New York Court of Appeals, 1966)
In re the Arbitration between Vanguard Insurance & Polchlopek
23 A.D.2d 625 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1965)
Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Travelers Insurance
206 A.2d 847 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1964)
Ratchford v. Fisk
43 Misc. 2d 127 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 Misc. 2d 859, 207 N.Y.S.2d 645, 1960 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-allstate-insurance-smith-nysupct-1960.