In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & O'Keeffe

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & O'Keeffe

30 A.D.2d 944, 293 N.Y.S.2d 951, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3219

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 8, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.2d 944 (In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & O'Keeffe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & O'Keeffe, 30 A.D.2d 944, 293 N.Y.S.2d 951, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3219 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from order entered February 2, 1968, denying reargument, unanimously dismissed without costs or disbursements, with leave to respondent-appellant to apply at Special Term for a rehearing and reconsideration upon proof demonstrating prima facie that appellant’s injuries resulted from an uninsured automobile or a “hit- and-run automobile.” The papers do not set out grounds for reargument. The denial is, therefore, not appealable. However, as there is some indication that appellant is really seeking a rehearing or reconsideration, an opportunity should be granted to him to make such application upon more complete papers providing the information indicated above. Concur — Eager, J. P., Steuer, Tilzer, Rabin and Macken, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from order entered February 2, 1968, denying reargument, unanimously dismissed without costs or disbursements, with leave to respondent-appellant to apply at Special Term for a rehearing and reconsideration upon proof demonstrating prima facie that appellant’s injuries resulted from an uninsured automobile or a “hit- and-run automobile.” The papers do not set out grounds for reargument. The denial is, therefore, not appealable. However, as there is some indication that appellant is really seeking a rehearing or reconsideration, an opportunity should be granted to him to make such application upon more complete papers providing the information indicated above. Concur — Eager, J. P., Steuer, Tilzer, Rabin and Macken, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 944, 293 N.Y.S.2d 951, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-allstate-insurance-okeeffe-nyappdiv-1968.