In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & Mitchell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & Mitchell

42 A.D.2d 584, 344 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4204

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 11, 1973

StatusPublished

This text of 42 A.D.2d 584 (In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & Mitchell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & Mitchell, 42 A.D.2d 584, 344 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4204 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding to stay arbitration demanded by respondents Edna and Howard Mitchell under an uninsured motorist endorsement on the liability insurance policy issued by petitioner to respondent Howard Mitchell, petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 28, 1972, which, after a nonjury trial of the issue of whether an uninsured vehicle was involved in the accident in question, dismissed the petition and directed arbitration to proceed. Order reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. In our opinion, there should be a new trial in order-.to afford the parties an opportunity to show whether there was compliance with the notice requirements of section 313 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (see Capra v. Lumbermen’s Mut. Cas. Go., 31 N NY 2d 760). Latham, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Gulotta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding to stay arbitration demanded by respondents Edna and Howard Mitchell under an uninsured motorist endorsement on the liability insurance policy issued by petitioner to respondent Howard Mitchell, petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered June 28, 1972, which, after a nonjury trial of the issue of whether an uninsured vehicle was involved in the accident in question, dismissed the petition and directed arbitration to proceed. Order reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. In our opinion, there should be a new trial in order-.to afford the parties an opportunity to show whether there was compliance with the notice requirements of section 313 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (see Capra v. Lumbermen’s Mut. Cas. Go., 31 N NY 2d 760). Latham, Acting P. J., Shapiro, Gulotta, Christ and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

42 A.D.2d 584, 344 N.Y.S.2d 1003, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-arbitration-between-allstate-insurance-mitchell-nyappdiv-1973.