In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & Chavez
40 A.D.2d 773, 337 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3433
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 9, 1972·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on April 5, 1972, affirmed. Respondent shall recover of appellant $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur — McGivern, J. P., Markewich, Nunez and Murphy, JJ.; McNally, J., would reverse and dismiss and stay arbitration upon the ground that the respondent did not establish a physical contact with a “ hit and run ” automobile by a fair preponderance of the credible evidence.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & Chavez, 40 A.D.2d 773, 337 N.Y.S.2d 983, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3433 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).
40 A.D.2d 773 (In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & Chavez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Loving v. Ponderosa Systems, Inc.
444 N.E.2d 896 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1983)
495 Corp. v. New Jersey Insurance
430 A.2d 203 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1981)
495 CORP. v. NJ Ins. Underwriting Ass'n.
430 A.2d 203 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1981)
Corp. v. NJ Ins. Underwriting Ass'n
413 A.2d 630 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1980)