In Re the Appraisal, Under the Transfer Tax Act, of the Estate of Vanderbilt

New York Court of Appeals

In Re the Appraisal, Under the Transfer Tax Act, of the Estate of Vanderbilt

64 N.E. 782, 172 N.Y. 69, 10 Bedell 69, 1902 N.Y. LEXIS 652

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 7, 1902

StatusPublished

Cited by75 cases

This text of 64 N.E. 782 (In Re the Appraisal, Under the Transfer Tax Act, of the Estate of Vanderbilt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re the Appraisal, Under the Transfer Tax Act, of the Estate of Vanderbilt, 64 N.E. 782, 172 N.Y. 69, 10 Bedell 69, 1902 N.Y. LEXIS 652 (N.Y. 1902).

Pincite

Opinions

Prior to an amendment of 1899 the Transfer Tax Law (L. 1896, ch. 908, section 230, as amended L. 1897, ch. 284), provided that "Estates in expectancy which are contingent or defeasible shall be appraised at their full, undiminished value when the persons entitled thereto shall come into the beneficial enjoyment or possession thereof * * *." Under this statute it has repeatedly been held that future contingent estates were not taxable until they vested in possession and the beneficial owner could be ascertained. The question now presented is as to whether this statute has been changed. The legislature, by chapter 76 of the Laws of 1899, amended section 230 of the Tax Laws, known as chapter 908 of the Laws of 1896, by which the provision of the statute quoted is omitted and in place thereof we have the following: "Whenever a transfer of property is made, upon which there is, or in any contingency there may be, a tax imposed, such property shall be appraised at its clear market value immediately upon such transfer, or as soon thereafter as practicable." Then follow provisions particularly specifying the manner in which the value of future or limited estates shall be determined. Then it is provided that "When property is transferred in trust or otherwise, and the rights, interests or estates of the *Page 72 transferees are dependent upon contingencies or conditions whereby they may be wholly or in part created, defeated, extended or abridged, a tax shall be imposed upon said transfer at the highest rate which, on the happening of any of the said contingencies or conditions, would be possible under the provisions of this article, and such tax so imposed shall be due and payable forthwith, out of the property transferred."

It seems to me clear that the legislature by this amendment intended to change the law upon the subject and to make the transfer tax, upon property transferred in trust payable forthwith. The tax is not required to be paid by the conditional transferee, for, by the provisions of the statute, it is to be paid "out of the property transferred." So that whoever may ultimately take the property takes that which remains after the payment of the tax. This amendment makes provision for property transferred in trust. It, therefore, contemplates defeasible transfers as well as absolute transfers.

By the seventeenth clause of the will of the testator the residue and remainder of his estate was given in trust to his executors for the benefit of his son Alfred G. Vanderbilt, which trust is to continue until he becomes thirty years of age, at which time one-half of the trust estate is to be turned over to him, and, as to the balance, the trust is to continue until he becomes thirty-five, when the remainder is to become his absolutely. The will also contains a provision that in case he dies before becoming thirty or thirty-five the estate shall be given to other persons. The only contingency, therefore, that can happen to defeat his taking the estate in possession is his death before the period fixed for the transfer of the possession of the property to him. The estate created, therefore, is an estate in trust for the periods mentioned, with a remainder vested in Alfred G., subject to be defeated by his death before arriving at the age of thirty or thirty-five. (Matter of Seaman, 147 N.Y. 72;Campbell v. Stokes, 142 N.Y. 23; Manice v. Manice,43 N.Y. 370; Warner v. Durant, 76 N.Y. 133; 2 Washburn on Real Property, 629.)

Under the view taken by me of this statute, the transfer *Page 73 tax still remains a tax upon succession. Each trust estate created is to be separately appraised and the tax determined according to the percentage fixed by the statute for those who are contingently entitled to the estate; and when fixed, the tax is forthwith payable out of the trust estate.

The order of the Appellate Division and that of the surrogate should be modified as indicated herein, and the proceedings remitted to assess the tax, with costs to the Comptroller.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Prior to an amendment of 1899 the Transfer Tax Law (L. 1896, ch. 908, section 230, as amended L. 1897, ch. 284), provided that "Estates in expectancy which are contingent or defeasible shall be appraised at their full, undiminished value when the persons entitled thereto shall come into the beneficial enjoyment or possession thereof * * *." Under this statute it has repeatedly been held that future contingent estates were not taxable until they vested in possession and the beneficial owner could be ascertained. The question now presented is as to whether this statute has been changed. The legislature, by chapter 76 of the Laws of 1899, amended section 230 of the Tax Laws, known as chapter 908 of the Laws of 1896, by which the provision of the statute quoted is omitted and in place thereof we have the following: "Whenever a transfer of property is made, upon which there is, or in any contingency there may be, a tax imposed, such property shall be appraised at its clear market value immediately upon such transfer, or as soon thereafter as practicable." Then follow provisions particularly specifying the manner in which the value of future or limited estates shall be determined. Then it is provided that "When property is transferred in trust or otherwise, and the rights, interests or estates of the *Page 72 transferees are dependent upon contingencies or conditions whereby they may be wholly or in part created, defeated, extended or abridged, a tax shall be imposed upon said transfer at the highest rate which, on the happening of any of the said contingencies or conditions, would be possible under the provisions of this article, and such tax so imposed shall be due and payable forthwith, out of the property transferred."

It seems to me clear that the legislature by this amendment intended to change the law upon the subject and to make the transfer tax, upon property transferred in trust payable forthwith. The tax is not required to be paid by the conditional transferee, for, by the provisions of the statute, it is to be paid "out of the property transferred." So that whoever may ultimately take the property takes that which remains after the payment of the tax. This amendment makes provision for property transferred in trust. It, therefore, contemplates defeasible transfers as well as absolute transfers.

By the seventeenth clause of the will of the testator the residue and remainder of his estate was given in trust to his executors for the benefit of his son Alfred G. Vanderbilt, which trust is to continue until he becomes thirty years of age, at which time one-half of the trust estate is to be turned over to him, and, as to the balance, the trust is to continue until he becomes thirty-five, when the remainder is to become his absolutely. The will also contains a provision that in case he dies before becoming thirty or thirty-five the estate shall be given to other persons. The only contingency, therefore, that can happen to defeat his taking the estate in possession is his death before the period fixed for the transfer of the possession of the property to him. The estate created, therefore, is an estate in trust for the periods mentioned, with a remainder vested in Alfred G., subject to be defeated by his death before arriving at the age of thirty or thirty-five. (Matter of Seaman, 147 N.Y. 72;Campbell v. Stokes, 142 N.Y. 23; Manice v. Manice,43 N.Y. 370; Warner v. Durant, 76 N.Y. 133; 2 Washburn on Real Property, 629.)

Under the view taken by me of this statute, the transfer *Page 73 tax still remains a tax upon succession. Each trust estate created is to be separately appraised and the tax determined according to the percentage fixed by the statute for those who are contingently entitled to the estate; and when fixed, the tax is forthwith payable out of the trust estate.

The order of the Appellate Division and that of the surrogate should be modified as indicated herein, and the proceedings remitted to assess the tax, with costs to the Comptroller.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

64 N.E. 782, 172 N.Y. 69, 10 Bedell 69, 1902 N.Y. LEXIS 652, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-appraisal-under-the-transfer-tax-act-of-the-estate-of-ny-1902.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack