In re the Appraisal under the Acts in Relation to the Taxable Transfers of Property of the Estate of Dee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Appraisal under the Acts in Relation to the Taxable Transfers of Property of the Estate of Dee

161 A.D. 881

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 161 A.D. 881 (In re the Appraisal under the Acts in Relation to the Taxable Transfers of Property of the Estate of Dee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Appraisal under the Acts in Relation to the Taxable Transfers of Property of the Estate of Dee, 161 A.D. 881 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Burr, J. (dissenting):

I can discover no evidence in this case that at the time of the gift by Dr. Dee to Mrs. O’Neil, which concededly is a gift “ inter vivos,” he was then under the apprehension of death which arose from some existing condition of body or some impending peril. (Matter of Baker, 83 App. Div. 530; affd. on opinion below, 178 N. Y. 575.) He was found dead about two o’clock in the morning of March 18, 1913, upon the stairs leading to his room. The cause of his death nowhere appears. The gift was about noon on March seventeenth. That forenoon, in answer to inquiries about his health, he replied, “I feel fine.” He had attended to his professional practice during the entire day, receiving patients in his office and visiting others in then homes.- His appearance was that of one in good health. It is true that about midnight of March seventeenth he was seen “testing his chest” with some instrument. This was nearly twelve hours after the completed gift. If any inference could be drawn from this incident, it was immediately destroyed by testimony from the same witness that the examination disclosed no disease. On the contrary, he then stated, in answer to a question addressed to him by the same witness, that he was not ill, and that he was “ all right.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burr, J. (dissenting):

I can discover no evidence in this case that at the time of the gift by Dr. Dee to Mrs. O’Neil, which concededly is a gift “ inter vivos,” he was then under the apprehension of death which arose from some existing condition of body or some impending peril. (Matter of Baker, 83 App. Div. 530; affd. on opinion below, 178 N. Y. 575.) He was found dead about two o’clock in the morning of March 18, 1913, upon the stairs leading to his room. The cause of his death nowhere appears. The gift was about noon on March seventeenth. That forenoon, in answer to inquiries about his health, he replied, “I feel fine.” He had attended to his professional practice during the entire day, receiving patients in his office and visiting others in then homes.- His appearance was that of one in good health. It is true that about midnight of March seventeenth he was seen “testing his chest” with some instrument. This was nearly twelve hours after the completed gift. If any inference could be drawn from this incident, it was immediately destroyed by testimony from the same witness that the examination disclosed no disease. On the contrary, he then stated, in answer to a question addressed to him by the same witness, that he was not ill, and that he was “ all right.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

161 A.D. 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-appraisal-under-the-acts-in-relation-to-the-taxable-transfers-of-nyappdiv-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack