In re the Appraisal of the Estate of Didion

6 Mills Surr. 148, 54 Misc. 201, 105 N.Y.S. 924
CourtNew York Surrogate's Court
DecidedApril 15, 1907
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 Mills Surr. 148 (In re the Appraisal of the Estate of Didion) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Surrogate's Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
In re the Appraisal of the Estate of Didion, 6 Mills Surr. 148, 54 Misc. 201, 105 N.Y.S. 924 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1907).

Opinion

Hart, S.

The testatrix, Mary Didion, after making special provision in her will for the payment of funeral expenses, by the second paragraph thereof makes the following bequests: “ I give, bequeath, and devise and direct that $200.00 be given to the. Assumption Church of Lancaster, N. Y. (so called St. Mary’s Church), for masses to be read for the repose of my soul, and One hundred ($100.00) dollars be given to the St. Mary’s Church of Buffalo, N. Y., for the repose of my soul.”

The transfer tax appraiser refused to tax these legacies. This appeal is taken from a decree of this court, entered on the 12th of December, 1906, confirming the report of the appraiser. The attorney for the appellant contends that the above bequests' are taxable, claiming that “ under the rules of the Roman Catholic Church all bequests for masses go to the priest, individually, who says the masses, and do not go to the church as & religious or charitable body, or for the religious or charitable purposes of the church.”

[149]*149The attorney for the executrix has made proof by affidavit to the contrary.

¡No attempt has been made, on the part of the executrix, to include the legacies in the schedule of funeral expenses of the testatrix; and the case is, therefore, to be distinguished from Matter of McAvoy, 112 App. Div. 377.

The legacies are bequeathed directly to religious bodies, the provision for masses being merely collateral and incidental. I am, therefore, of the opinion that the appraiser has committed no error, and that the decree as entered, exempting the legacies as provided by section 221 of the Transfer Tax Law, must be-affirmed.

Decree affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Goergen v. State Tax Commission
165 N.W.2d 782 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Mills Surr. 148, 54 Misc. 201, 105 N.Y.S. 924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-appraisal-of-the-estate-of-didion-nysurct-1907.