In re the Appointment of Richardson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Appointment of Richardson

25 A.D.2d 669

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 1, 1966·Published

Opinion

Pursuant to the provisions of law (N. Y. Const., art. YI, § 4; Judiciary Law, § 90; CPLR 9401), Roy M. D. Richardson, Esq., a practicing lawyer residing in the County of Kings, is hereby appointed (in place of Robert W. Cauldwell, Esq., resigned) as a member of the respective Committees on Character and Fitness for the Second, Tenth and Eleventh Judicial Districts in the Second Judicial Department, to investigate the character and fitness of applicants in said judicial districts for admission to practice as attorneys and counselors at law in the courts of this State; such appointment to take effieet as of March 14, 1966.

Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan, Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pursuant to the provisions of law (N. Y. Const., art. YI, § 4; Judiciary Law, § 90; CPLR 9401), Roy M. D. Richardson, Esq., a practicing lawyer residing in the County of Kings, is hereby appointed (in place of Robert W. Cauldwell, Esq., resigned) as a member of the respective Committees on Character and Fitness for the Second, Tenth and Eleventh Judicial Districts in the Second Judicial Department, to investigate the character and fitness of applicants in said judicial districts for admission to practice as attorneys and counselors at law in the courts of this State; such appointment to take effieet as of March 14, 1966.

Beldoek, P. J., Ughetta, Christ, Brennan, Hill, Rabin, Hopkins and Benjamin, JJ., concur.

In re the Appointment of Richardson, 25 A.D.2d 669 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

25 A.D.2d 669 (In re the Appointment of Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related