In re the Appointment of a Guardian of Morrisey

107 A. 895, 89 N.J. Eq. 237, 4 Stock. 237, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 358
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 3, 1918·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The order appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Walker, ordinary.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner — 12.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Appointment of a Guardian of Morrisey, 107 A. 895, 89 N.J. Eq. 237, 4 Stock. 237, 1918 N.J. LEXIS 358 (N.J. 1918).

107 A. 895 (In re the Appointment of a Guardian of Morrisey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Queiro
864 A.2d 437 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2005)