In re the Appointment of a Committee of Person & Property of Marshall

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Appointment of a Committee of Person & Property of Marshall

17 A.D.2d 800, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7531

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 23, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.D.2d 800 (In re the Appointment of a Committee of Person & Property of Marshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Appointment of a Committee of Person & Property of Marshall, 17 A.D.2d 800, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7531 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion for a stay granted on consent; pending the hearing and determination of the appeal, this court suspends Michael T. Marshall, Jr., and Frederick Weisse as committeemen; the appellants-respondents are permitted to dispense with the printing of the record on appeal and the appellants-respondents and respondent-appellant are permitted to dispense with the printing of their appellants’ points, and the appeals are permitted to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellants’ points, on .condition that the appellants-respondents and respondent-appellant serve one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellants’ points upon the attorneys for respondents, and file 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of appellants’ points, together with the original record, with this court, on or before November 8, 1962, with notice of argument for November 20, 1962, said appeals to be argued or submitted when reached. The respondents may dispense with the printing of their respondents’ points on condition that they serve one typewritten or mimeographed copy of said points on the attorneys for appellants and file 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of said points with this court on or before November 14, 1962. The cross motion of respondent-appellant is denied. Concur — McNally, J. P., Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for a stay granted on consent; pending the hearing and determination of the appeal, this court suspends Michael T. Marshall, Jr., and Frederick Weisse as committeemen; the appellants-respondents are permitted to dispense with the printing of the record on appeal and the appellants-respondents and respondent-appellant are permitted to dispense with the printing of their appellants’ points, and the appeals are permitted to be heard on the original record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellants’ points, on .condition that the appellants-respondents and respondent-appellant serve one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellants’ points upon the attorneys for respondents, and file 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of appellants’ points, together with the original record, with this court, on or before November 8, 1962, with notice of argument for November 20, 1962, said appeals to be argued or submitted when reached. The respondents may dispense with the printing of their respondents’ points on condition that they serve one typewritten or mimeographed copy of said points on the attorneys for appellants and file 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of said points with this court on or before November 14, 1962. The cross motion of respondent-appellant is denied. Concur — McNally, J. P., Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.D.2d 800, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-appointment-of-a-committee-of-person-property-of-marshall-nyappdiv-1962.