In re the Application under the Election Law, on the Petition of Soffer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

In re the Application under the Election Law, on the Petition of Soffer

252 A.D. 774, 299 N.Y.S. 8, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6246

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 21, 1937

StatusPublished

This text of 252 A.D. 774 (In re the Application under the Election Law, on the Petition of Soffer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Application under the Election Law, on the Petition of Soffer, 252 A.D. 774, 299 N.Y.S. 8, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6246 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying petitioner’s application for an order directing the board of elections of the city of New York to reject the certificate of Thomas J. Towers as candidate of the Democratic party for justice of the City Court of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, reversed on the law and motion granted, without costs, on authority of Matter of Grosser (ante, p. 772), decided herewith. Davis, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur; Hagarty and Johnston, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum in Matter of Gresser (ante, p. 773), decided herewith. Leave tó appeal to the Court of Appeals is granted. Present —■ Hagarty, Davis, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying petitioner’s application for an order directing the board of elections of the city of New York to reject the certificate of Thomas J. Towers as candidate of the Democratic party for justice of the City Court of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, reversed on the law and motion granted, without costs, on authority of Matter of Grosser (ante, p. 772), decided herewith. Davis, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur; Hagarty and Johnston, JJ., dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting memorandum in Matter of Gresser (ante, p. 773), decided herewith. Leave tó appeal to the Court of Appeals is granted. Present —■ Hagarty, Davis, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 A.D. 774, 299 N.Y.S. 8, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6246, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-application-under-the-election-law-on-the-petition-of-soffer-nyappdiv-1937.