In re the Application to Set Aside the Election of O'Shea

241 A.D. 699
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1934·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Matter of Farrell (205 App. Div. 443; affd., 236 N. Y. 603), invoked by the appellant, is not controlling. That ease turned upon the construction of the by-laws of the Brooklyn City Savings and Loan Association, organized under the Banking Law, which contained no affirmative provision prescribing that no one should be eligible for election to the office of director of the association unless nominated as provided in the by-laws. It was held that in the absence of such a provision it must be concluded that the provision for nominations was directory only. Here the by-laws provide for nominations, first, by the nominating committee of the association, to be posted not less than two weeks prior to the annual meeting; second, by independent nominations, to be posted not less than five days prior to such meeting, and, finally, that “ No candidates for directors shall be balloted for, other than those proposed in either one of these two ways.” Such provisions are not only reasonable but necessary. Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Davis, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., concurs in result.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re the Application to Set Aside the Election of O'Shea, 241 A.D. 699 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

241 A.D. 699 (In re the Application to Set Aside the Election of O'Shea) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stuberfield v. Long Island City Savings & Loan Ass'n
37 Misc. 2d 811 (New York Supreme Court, 1962)
Commonwealth Ex Rel. Grabert v. Markey
190 A. 892 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1937)