In re the Application of Stevenson

D.C. Circuit

In re the Application of Stevenson

10 F.2d 1009, 56 App. D.C. 144, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2330

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedFebruary 1, 1926

DocketNo. 1796

StatusPublished

This text of 10 F.2d 1009 (In re the Application of Stevenson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In re the Application of Stevenson, 10 F.2d 1009, 56 App. D.C. 144, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2330 (D.C. Cir. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This appeal is from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, rejecting appellant’s application for a patent on a lock joint for sucker rods.

It is unnecessary to enter into a discussion of the merits of this case, since the device for which invention is claimed and a patent sought is completely anticipated by the pri- or art, as set forth in the opinions of the respective tribunals of the Patent Office.

The opinion of the Commissioner is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This appeal is from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, rejecting appellant’s application for a patent on a lock joint for sucker rods.

It is unnecessary to enter into a discussion of the merits of this case, since the device for which invention is claimed and a patent sought is completely anticipated by the pri- or art, as set forth in the opinions of the respective tribunals of the Patent Office.

The opinion of the Commissioner is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 F.2d 1009, 56 App. D.C. 144, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-the-application-of-stevenson-cadc-1926.